Search
|
Est
Back to top

Learning Estonian as a second language – hard work or easy fun?

Keywords: Estonian as a second language, language acquisition, language constructions, usage-based approach, gamification

 

The article tries to answer the question whether Estonian as a second language can be learned in a way that is not only effective, but also easy and fun. First, the principles of second language development are discussed. This discussion is based on the view that language consists of constructions – linguistic units in which words and grammar are inextricably intertwined and whose form and meaning form a whole (e.g. I do not know) (Goldberg 1995; Croft 2001). Constructions develop in the learner language on a usage-based way (Eskildsen 2008; Martin et al. 2010; Mustonen 2015; Kitsnik 2018). This means that to acquire a second language a person needs much input from an authentic language environment, as well as a lot of opportunities to try and use the language.

To support the teaching of a second language in language classes, there is a need to use as authentic linguistic inputs as possible and create a lot of motivating ways to use the language in realistic situations. To achieve these goals the innovative methodology of gamification seems very suitable. Using this methodology learners are really involved in exciting situations, which needs a lot of improvisation and offers challenges. Active and realistic activities, a good atmosphere and support make language learning easy and allow constructions to develop effectively. Joint performing of fun tasks give learners a lot of positive emotions and make language learning fun.

 

Mare Kitsnik (b. 1962), PhD, University of Tartu, Department of Applied Linguistics, Senior Research Fellow in Estonian as Foreign Language (Jakobi 2-437, 51005 Tartu), mare.kitsnik@ut.ee

 

References

B r o p h y, Jere 2004. Motivating Students to Learn. Mahwah–New Jersey–London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

B y b e e, Joan 2000. Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments. – Language Acquisition and the Lexicon. (Papers in Laboratory Phonology V.) Toim Michael B. Broe, Janet B. Pierrehumbert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 250–268.

CEFR 2007 = Euroopa keeleõppe raamdokument. Õppimine, õpetamine ja hindamine. Tartu: Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium.

Centar 2018 = Eesti keelest erineva emakeelega täiskasvanute eesti keele õpe lõimumis- ja tööhõivepoliitikas: kvaliteet, mõju ja korraldus. Tallinn: Eesti Rakendusuuringute Keskus Centar, Tallinna Ülikool.

C h a m b e r s, Gary N. 1999. Motivating Language Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

C s i k s z e n t m i h a l y i, Mihaly 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.

C s i k s z e n t m i h a l y i, Mihaly 1997. Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: A flow analysis. – Teaching Well and Liking It: Motivating Faculty to Teach Effectively. Toim James L. Bess. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, lk 72–89.

C l a r k, Eve V. 1978. Discovering what words can do. – Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, Chicago Linguistics Society, April 14–15, 1978. Toim Donka Farkas, Wesley M. Jacobsen, Karol W. Todrys. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, lk 34–57.

C r o f t, William 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

D ö r n y e i, Zoltán 1994. Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. – Modern Language Journal, kd 78, nr 3, lk 273–284.

D ö r n y e i, Zoltán 2001. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D ö r n y e i, Zoltán, C s i z é r, Kata 1998. Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. – Language Teaching Research, kd 2, nr 3, lk 203–229.

E g b e r t, Joy 2003. A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. – The Modern Language Journal, kd 87, nr 4, lk 499–518. 

E l l i s, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, kd 24, nr 2, lk 143–188.

E l l i s, Nick C. 2003. Chapter 4: Constructions, chunking and connectionism. The emergence of second language structure. – The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Toim Catherine J. Doughty, Michael H. Long. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, lk 63–103.

E l l i s, Nick C. 2005. Introduction to Part 1: Acquisition. – Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Toim Judith F. Kroll, Annette M. B. de Groot. Oxford: Oxford University Press, lk 3–7.

E l l i s, Nick C. 2013. Second Language Acquisition. – The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Toim Thomas Hoffmann, Graeme Trousdale. Oxford: Oxford University Press, lk 365–378.

E l l i s, Nick C., F e r r e i r a-J u n i o r, Fernando 2009. Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. – Modern Language Journal, kd 93, nr 3, lk 370–385.

E l l i s, Nick C., L a r s e n-F r e e m a n, Diane 2009. Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. – Language Learning, kd 59, nr S1, lk 93–128.

E l l i s, Nick C., S a g a r r a, Nuria 2013. From seeing adverbs to seeing verbal morphology: Language experience and adult acquisition of L2 tense. – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, kd 35, nr 2, lk 261–290.

English Profile. http://www.englishprofile.org (7. I 2019).

E s k i l d s e n, Søren Wind 2008. Constructing a Second Language Inventory: The Accumulation of Linguistic Resources in L2 English. (PhD dissertation.) Odense: Institute of Language and Communication University of Southern Denmark.

G a r d n e r, Robert C. 2007. Motivation and second language acquisition. – Porta Linguarum, nr 8, lk 9–20.

G o l d b e r g, Adele 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

G o l d b e r g, Adele 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. – Trends in Cognitive Sciences, kd 7, nr 5, lk 219–224.

H a d f i e l d, Jill 2010. Rühmadünaamika võõrkeeletunnis. Tlk Ursula Erik. Tallinn: Argo.

H a r m e r, Jeremy 2007. How to Teach English. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

H u l s t i j n, Jan H., L a u f e r, Batia 2001. Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. – Language Learning, kd 51, nr 3, lk 539–558.

K a i v a p a l u, Annekatrin 2005. Lähdekieli kielenoppimisen apuna. (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanites 44.) Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.

K a r m, Mari 2013. Õppemeetodid kõrgkoolis. Tallinn: SA Archimedes. http://www.digar.ee/id/nlib-digar:121275 (7. I 2019).

K i m, Bohyun 2015. Understanding Gamification. (Library Technology Reports, kd 51, nr 2.) Chicago: American Library Association.

K i t s n i k, Mare 2018. Iga asi omal ajal: eesti keele B1- ja B2-taseme verbikonstruktsioonid keeleoskuse arengu näitajana. (Humanitaarteaduste dissertatsioonid 43.) Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikool.

L a r s e n-F r e e m a n, Diane 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. – Applied Linguistics, kd 18, nr 2, lk 141–165.

L a r s e n-F r e e m a n, Diane 2007. Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. – The Modern Language Journal, kd 91, nr S1, lk 773–787.

L o b m a n, Carry, L u n d q u i s t, Matthew 2007. Unscripted Learning: Using Improv Activities Across the K-8 Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

L o n g, Michael H. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and negotiation of comprehensible input. – Applied Linguistics, kd 4, nr 2, lk 126–141.

L o n g, Michael H. 1996. The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. – Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Toim William C. Ritchie, Tej K. Bhatia. San Diego: Academic Press, lk 413–468.

M a c W h i n n e y, Brian 2002. The Competition Model: The Input, the Context, and the Brain. (Paper 219.) Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology.

M a c W h i n n e y, Brian 2004. A unified model of language acquisition. – Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. Toim Judith Kroll, Annette de Groot. Oxford: Oxford University Press, lk 49–67.

M a r t i n, Maisa, M u s t o n e n, Sanna, R e i m a n, Nina, S e i l o n e n, Marja 2010. On becoming an independent user. – Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections Between SLA and Language Testing Research. (Eurosla Monographs Series 1). Toim Inge Bartning, M. Martin, Ineke Vedder. EUROSLA, lk 57–80.

M e h i s t o, Peeter, M a r s h, David, F r i g o l s  M a r t í n, María Jesús, V õ l l i, Kai, A s s e r, Hiie 2010. Lõimitud aine- ja keeleõpe. Tallinn: Integratsiooni ja Migratsiooni Sihtasutus Meie Inimesed.

M u s t o n e n, Sanna 2015. Käytössä kehittyvä kieli. Paikat ja tilat suomi toisena kielenä oppijoiden teksteissä. (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 255.) Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.

N i e m i, Päivi M., V a i n i o m ä k i, Paula T. 1999. Medical students’ distress, coping and achievement strategies during the preclinical years. – Teaching and Learning in Medicine, nr 11, lk 125–134.

N i n i o, Anat 1999. Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. – Journal of Child Language, kd 26, nr 3, lk 619–653.

P a a v o l a, Vilja 2008. Haluatko menna muunkansa kalastaman? Verbiketjujen kehkeytyminen suomi toisena kielenä -oppijoiden kielessä. (Suomen kielen pro gradu-tutkielma.) Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.

P e l l i n g, Nick 2011. The (short) prehistory of „gamification”. http://nanodome.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/the-short-prehistory-of-gamification (7. I 2019).

P i n k e r, Steven 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

R y a n, Richard M., D e c i, Edward L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. – American Psychologist, kd 55, nr 1, lk 68–78.

S c h m i d t, Richard 2001. Attention. – Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Toim Peter Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 3–32.

S e i l o n e n, Marja 2013. Epäsuora henkilöön viittaaminen oppijansuomessa. (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 197.) Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.

S i l l a o t s, Martin 2016. Creating the Flow: The Gamification of Higher Education Courses. (Dissertations on social sciences 107.) Tallinn: Tallinn University.

S p a d a, Nina 1997. Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. – Language Teaching, kd 30, nr 2, lk 73–87.

S p o l i n, Viola 1986. Theater Games for the Classroom. A Teacher’s Handbook. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

S t a n s b u r y, Meris 2011. Five things students say they want from education. – eSchool News, 28. VII. http://www.eschoolnews.com/2011/07/28/five-things-students-say-they-want-from-education (7. I 2019).

Z i p f, George Kingsley 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison: Wesley Press.


T h a r p, Roland G., G a l l i m o r e, Ronald G. 1988. Rousing Minds to Life. Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

T o m a s e l l o, Michael 2000. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. – Cognitive Linguistics, kd 11, nr 1–2, lk 61–82.

T o m a s e l l o, Michael 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

T o m l i n s o n, B. 2012. Materials development for language learning and teaching. – Language Teaching, kd 45, nr 2, lk 143–179.

W a g e n a a r, A., S c h e r p b i e r, A. J., B o s h u i z e n, H. P. A., V a n d e r V l e u t e n, C. P. M. 2003. The importance of active involvement in learning: A qualitative study on learning results and learning processes in different traineeships. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, nr 8, lk 201–212.